- About bilaterals.org
- Feb-2016: New ISDS platform launched
- Sep-2004: Launch announcement
- Feb-2015: Relaunch of bilaterals.org
- Mar-2013: Relaunch of bilaterals.org
- Jun-2009: Relaunch of bilaterals.org
- Dec-2008: An update from bilaterals.org and logo design contest announcement
- Dec-2006: bilaterals.org in Spanish & French
- Sep-2006: Update from bilaterals.org
- How to participate
- Key issues
- Texts of agreements
Africa: Industry sees red over red line
- Veterinary checkpoint in Zambia
The Nambian | 18 August 2009
Africa: Industry Sees Red Over Red Line
Various participants in a talk on the economic partnership agreement (EPA) with the European Union (EU) yesterday saw red when Finance Permanent Secretary Calle Schlettwein dared suggesting that the veterinary fence in the North be gradually moved further North to offer those farmers the same market access as those south of the fence.
The PS used the so-called Red Line as an example to illustrate one of the reasons why Namibia has refused to sign the interim EPA so far: that of the developed world prescribing to the developing world, which is simply expected to follow regardless of its developmental needs.
The veterinary fence is used as a disease control mechanism to isolate outbreaks of foot-and-mouth disease north of the line.
"If we should sign the interim EPA and then decide to move the Red Line, we’ll lose access to the EU beef market," Schlettwein said at a public dialogue of the Friedrich Ebert Foundation and the Agricultural Trade Forum.
Consequently Namibia is forced to protect the existing EU market for beef at the expense of farmers north of the Red Line who are currently "distinctly disadvantaged", Schlettwein said.
It just goes to show how a seemingly harmless trade agreement can impact significantly on the developmental issues of a country, he said.
This sparked a heated debate, with several members of the audience saying the Red Line should only be handled as a sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) issue, and that any tampering with the fence would spell the end of Namibia’s preferential access to the EU’s lucrative markets, worth nearly N$400 million annually, and therefore the livelihood of many commercial farmers.
Schlettwein was undeterred.
The Red Line is much more than just a SPS issue, he said, adding that it has a "very serious socio-economic" side. Nearly 55 per cent of Namibians live north of the cordon fence, and those farmers are currently deprived of markets.
Namibia only exports prime cuts to the EU at the moment, while cheaper cuts and beef from north of the Red Line can be exported to South Africa, Schlettwein said.
"Maybe not at the same price," he admitted, but added that the South African market is much more important in monetary and developmental terms.
Namibia is furthermore trying to diversify its beef export market to the United States, China and India, Schlettwein said.
Price might once again be a factor, but at least the conditions would be more favourable, he said.
Schlettwein said Government is investing vast amounts of money to make the North more disease free, to strengthen the fence, to improve the quality of livestock and abattoirs and to make marketing in the region more efficient.
News from the movements
7-Dec-2016 Radio UchileA la audiencia ante la CIDH asiste una delegación con representantes indígenas y de sociedad civil que forman parte de las entidades peticionarias de los tres países, además del Grupo Internacional de Trabajo sobre Asuntos Indígenas.
7-Dec-2016 Coalition Nationale Non aux APEOui à une intégration africaine souveraine et populaire
5-Dec-2016 Médecins Sans Frontières
MSF press release: RCEP trade deal negotiators must reject terms that would harm access to medicinesInternational medical humanitarian organisation Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), along with other health groups, reiterated concerns about harmful intellectual property provisions in the proposed agreement that would increase market monopolies for pharmaceutical corporations and delay or block access to affordable generic medicines.
30-Nov-2016 No al TTIPCientos de organizaciones europeas y canadienses instan a las/los legisladores a votar en contra del Acuerdo Integral de Economía y Comercio (CETA).
30-Nov-2016 Temp.coJelang perundingan perdagangan bebas ASEAN RCEP (Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership) di Indonesia, organisasi masyarakat sipil dari berbagai negara mulai melayangkan protes kepada pemerintah di negara-negara yang akan menandatangani perjanjian tersebut.
30-Nov-2016Este es un llamamiento urgente de 316 organizaciones de la sociedad civil de los países de Asia y el Pacífico que negocian la Asociación Económica Regional Ampliada para que el contenido tóxico del TPPT no se incorpore al RCEP
29-Nov-2016This is an urgent call by 316 civil society organisations from across the Asian and Pacific countries negotiating the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership to reject TPP rules in the RCEP
29-Nov-2016 S2BWe, the undersigned civil society organisations from Canada and Europe, hereby express our deep concern about the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between the EU and Canada.
bilaterals.org is a collaborative space to share information and support movements struggling against bilateral trade and investment deals which serve corporations, not people. Multilingual. Global. No one owns it. Open publishing. Get involved.