- About bilaterals.org
- Feb-2016: New ISDS platform launched
- Sep-2004: Launch announcement
- Feb-2015: Relaunch of bilaterals.org
- Mar-2013: Relaunch of bilaterals.org
- Jun-2009: Relaunch of bilaterals.org
- Dec-2008: An update from bilaterals.org and logo design contest announcement
- Dec-2006: bilaterals.org in Spanish & French
- Sep-2006: Update from bilaterals.org
- How to participate
- Key issues
- Texts of agreements
Africa: Industry sees red over red line
- Veterinary checkpoint in Zambia
The Nambian | 18 August 2009
Africa: Industry Sees Red Over Red Line
Various participants in a talk on the economic partnership agreement (EPA) with the European Union (EU) yesterday saw red when Finance Permanent Secretary Calle Schlettwein dared suggesting that the veterinary fence in the North be gradually moved further North to offer those farmers the same market access as those south of the fence.
The PS used the so-called Red Line as an example to illustrate one of the reasons why Namibia has refused to sign the interim EPA so far: that of the developed world prescribing to the developing world, which is simply expected to follow regardless of its developmental needs.
The veterinary fence is used as a disease control mechanism to isolate outbreaks of foot-and-mouth disease north of the line.
"If we should sign the interim EPA and then decide to move the Red Line, we’ll lose access to the EU beef market," Schlettwein said at a public dialogue of the Friedrich Ebert Foundation and the Agricultural Trade Forum.
Consequently Namibia is forced to protect the existing EU market for beef at the expense of farmers north of the Red Line who are currently "distinctly disadvantaged", Schlettwein said.
It just goes to show how a seemingly harmless trade agreement can impact significantly on the developmental issues of a country, he said.
This sparked a heated debate, with several members of the audience saying the Red Line should only be handled as a sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) issue, and that any tampering with the fence would spell the end of Namibia’s preferential access to the EU’s lucrative markets, worth nearly N$400 million annually, and therefore the livelihood of many commercial farmers.
Schlettwein was undeterred.
The Red Line is much more than just a SPS issue, he said, adding that it has a "very serious socio-economic" side. Nearly 55 per cent of Namibians live north of the cordon fence, and those farmers are currently deprived of markets.
Namibia only exports prime cuts to the EU at the moment, while cheaper cuts and beef from north of the Red Line can be exported to South Africa, Schlettwein said.
"Maybe not at the same price," he admitted, but added that the South African market is much more important in monetary and developmental terms.
Namibia is furthermore trying to diversify its beef export market to the United States, China and India, Schlettwein said.
Price might once again be a factor, but at least the conditions would be more favourable, he said.
Schlettwein said Government is investing vast amounts of money to make the North more disease free, to strengthen the fence, to improve the quality of livestock and abattoirs and to make marketing in the region more efficient.
News from the movements
Ante la reciente avalancha de demandas de corporaciones en tribunales arbitrales contra nuestros países, ¡decimos YA BASTA!Las organizaciones y redes de la sociedad civil que firmamos esta declaración expresamos nuestro rechazo al avance del poder de las empresas transnacionales, que se sustenta en los diferentes tratados de libre comercio e inversiones que existen actualmente en los países de toda América
22-Jul-2016 The HillA group of entertainers is hitting the road to kick off a campaign to build opposition against a Pacific trade agreement.
21-Jul-2016 ANAMURIRatificar el TPP es renunciar a la soberanía nacional y a cualquier proyecto de soberanía popular.
20-Jul-2016 NOUMINRENAt the time of the GATT Uruguay Round Agreement, Japan accepted the import of Minimum Access (MA) rice. This situation will get worse by the additional import quotas set by the TPP.
19-Jul-2016 Biodiversidad en América Latina
Llamado a adherir - ¡Los pueblos y el planeta antes que el lucro! Alternativas al libre comercio y al extractivismo para desmantelar el poder de las transnacionalesUna oportunidad para los grupos y movimientos que combaten el extractivismo y trabajan por la justicia social, que atacan la arquitectura de los Acuerdos de Libre Comercio e Inversiones, que desafían, a cada paso, el poder de las transnacionales, que luchan por la justicia climática, de reunirse para consolidar e impulsar la coordinación de acciones.
18-Jul-2016 GRAINFTAs negotiated outside the WTO go further and help US and European corporations get what they weren’t able to achieve under TRIPS.
15-Jul-2016 ATTAC Argentina
Argentina le dice No al libre comercio. Crónica de la Audiencia pública de “Argentina mejor sin TLC”En una sala del Congreso Nacional colmada se realizó este lunes 11 de julio la Audiencia pública contra los Tratados de Libre Comercio.
15-Jul-2016A chronicle of the public audience organized by the Assembly “Argentina better off without free trade agreements”.
bilaterals.org is a collaborative space to share information and support movements struggling against bilateral trade and investment deals which serve corporations, not people. Multilingual. Global. No one owns it. Open publishing. Get involved.