- About bilaterals.org
- Feb-2016: New ISDS platform launched
- Sep-2004: Launch announcement
- Feb-2015: Relaunch of bilaterals.org
- Mar-2013: Relaunch of bilaterals.org
- Jun-2009: Relaunch of bilaterals.org
- Dec-2008: An update from bilaterals.org and logo design contest announcement
- Dec-2006: bilaterals.org in Spanish & French
- Sep-2006: Update from bilaterals.org
- How to participate
- Key issues
- Texts of agreements
Africa: Industry sees red over red line
- Veterinary checkpoint in Zambia
The Nambian | 18 August 2009
Africa: Industry Sees Red Over Red Line
Various participants in a talk on the economic partnership agreement (EPA) with the European Union (EU) yesterday saw red when Finance Permanent Secretary Calle Schlettwein dared suggesting that the veterinary fence in the North be gradually moved further North to offer those farmers the same market access as those south of the fence.
The PS used the so-called Red Line as an example to illustrate one of the reasons why Namibia has refused to sign the interim EPA so far: that of the developed world prescribing to the developing world, which is simply expected to follow regardless of its developmental needs.
The veterinary fence is used as a disease control mechanism to isolate outbreaks of foot-and-mouth disease north of the line.
"If we should sign the interim EPA and then decide to move the Red Line, we’ll lose access to the EU beef market," Schlettwein said at a public dialogue of the Friedrich Ebert Foundation and the Agricultural Trade Forum.
Consequently Namibia is forced to protect the existing EU market for beef at the expense of farmers north of the Red Line who are currently "distinctly disadvantaged", Schlettwein said.
It just goes to show how a seemingly harmless trade agreement can impact significantly on the developmental issues of a country, he said.
This sparked a heated debate, with several members of the audience saying the Red Line should only be handled as a sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) issue, and that any tampering with the fence would spell the end of Namibia’s preferential access to the EU’s lucrative markets, worth nearly N$400 million annually, and therefore the livelihood of many commercial farmers.
Schlettwein was undeterred.
The Red Line is much more than just a SPS issue, he said, adding that it has a "very serious socio-economic" side. Nearly 55 per cent of Namibians live north of the cordon fence, and those farmers are currently deprived of markets.
Namibia only exports prime cuts to the EU at the moment, while cheaper cuts and beef from north of the Red Line can be exported to South Africa, Schlettwein said.
"Maybe not at the same price," he admitted, but added that the South African market is much more important in monetary and developmental terms.
Namibia is furthermore trying to diversify its beef export market to the United States, China and India, Schlettwein said.
Price might once again be a factor, but at least the conditions would be more favourable, he said.
Schlettwein said Government is investing vast amounts of money to make the North more disease free, to strengthen the fence, to improve the quality of livestock and abattoirs and to make marketing in the region more efficient.
News from the movements
27-Apr-2017 Mujeres en la MingaNosotras las Mujeres, luchamos contra los TLC ya que estos acuerdos son más que simples reglamentaciones del comercio entre países, son estrategias de dominación de las personas.
27-Apr-2017 Forum against FTAsTrade unions, farmers groups, health activists, and other people’s movements are planning to organise a series of events to put pressure on the Government of India to withdraw from RCEP negotiations.
24-Apr-2017 GRAINTenemos por delante, potencialmente, una ola de nuevas normas de “comercio, inversión y cooperación”, y nuestra región se verá fuertemente presionada a aceptar más abusos e indefensión ante las empresas.
24-Apr-2017 USWAfter three decades of NAFTA, Mexican workers are still denied basic rights.
21-Apr-2017 Chile Mejor sin TPPSus representantes afirmaron que tratados como el TPP, el TISA y otros acentúan el extractivismo intensivo en uso de agua y atentan contra las decisiones soberanas de los pueblos respecto al medioambiente.
10-Apr-2017 Coalition Nationale "Non aux APE"La Coalition se désole de ce que des citoyens arrivent difficilement à échanger avec les autorités de ce pays sur des questions aussi importantes que les APE et la ZLEC.
7-Apr-2017 Argentina Mejor sin TLCLos pueblos latinoamericanos decimos NO a los Tratados de Libre Comercio ¡Basta de privilegios para las empresas a costa de nuestros derechos!
4-Apr-2017 No al TTIPLa campaña No al TTIP, CETA, TiSA apoya la iniciativa del grupo parlamentario Unidos Podemos – En Comú Podem – En Marea que el Congreso de los Diputados solicite al Tribunal Constitucional un examen sobre si el tratado UE-Canadá viola derechos constitucionales de la ciudadanía tal como se ha hecho en Francia y Alemania.
bilaterals.org is a collaborative space to share information and support movements struggling against bilateral trade and investment deals which serve corporations, not people. Multilingual. Global. No one owns it. Open publishing. Get involved.