- About bilaterals.org
- Feb-2016: New ISDS platform launched
- Sep-2004: Launch announcement
- Feb-2015: Relaunch of bilaterals.org
- Mar-2013: Relaunch of bilaterals.org
- Jun-2009: Relaunch of bilaterals.org
- Dec-2008: An update from bilaterals.org and logo design contest announcement
- Dec-2006: bilaterals.org in Spanish & French
- Sep-2006: Update from bilaterals.org
- How to participate
- Key issues
- Texts of agreements
Korea-US Free Trade Agreement a Job-Killer
International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) - ITUC OnLine
Korea-US Free Trade Agreement a Job-Killer
Press Release: International Trade Union Confederation
16 December 2011
Brussels, (ITUC OnLine): The ITUC, supported by its Korean and US affiliates, has warned that the new “KORUS” free trade agreement between the two countries will cost hundreds of thousands of jobs. The agreement was rushed through the Korean parliament in a hastily-convened session designed to catch opposition parties off-guard and minimise the possibility for public reaction.
“This agreement will have devastating consequences for thousands of families at time when governments should be focused on creating jobs, not undermining decent work and driving living standards down. It does not provide adequate mechanisms to protect people’s rights at work, it will fuel even more financial speculation, and the dispute-settlement procedures which override national law are effectively anti-democratic,” said ITUC General Secretary Sharan Burrow.
Independent estimates of the agreement’s employment impact show there could even be loss of as many as 130,000 agricultural jobs in Korea, and more than 150,000 in the US. Even the US’s own International Trade Commission concluded that the employment impact would probably be negligible, contrary to claims from the American Chamber of Commerce that it would create as many as 280,000 new jobs.
“The American Chamber of Commerce has made fictitious job-creation claims around previous such agreements. History has proven them wrong, but the truth is again being sacrificed to the special interests of the 1%. Some big corporations will profit from this deal, but the overall impact is likely to cause serious economic and social damage,” said Burrow.
The Korean trade union centres FKTU and KCTU have expressed their opposition to the KORUS, with the KCTU organising a 40,000-strong protest against it in Seoul on November 13. The KCTU has described the agreement as “damaging to workers and working families in the US and Korea”, while AFL-CIO President Rich Trumka has stated that it does not live up to the new trade model the labour movement has been advocating, nor does it contribute to a sustainable global future. “It is essential that both countries bring their labour laws and practice fully into compliance with international standards prior to implementation of the agreement,” according to Trumka.
“The KORUS agreement should be postponed until it has been redesigned to promote decent work and respect for core labour standards,” said Burrow. “The Investor-State Dispute Settlement Mechanism should be removed from it and a full public assessment of the economic and social impact of the FTA on workers in both countries needs to be carried out.”
The ITUC represents 175 million workers in 153 countries and territories and has 308 national affiliates.
News from the movements
31-Aug-2016 ArcInfoUne plainte record de plus de 125 000 personnes a été déposée en Allemagne contre l’accord de libre-échange Ceta entre l’Union européenne et le Canada.
31-Aug-2016 Solidaritas PerempuanTidak seperti TPP yang wacananya sangat mengemuka di ruang publik, RCEP nampaknya tidak menjadi perhatian meskipun juga akan berdampak bagi kehidupan masyarakat, termasuk kehidupan perempuan. Meskipun sering disebut sebagai perjanjian perdagangan, namun ruang lingkup RCEP lebih luas dari sekedar perdagangan.
31-Aug-2016 No al TTIPLa sociedad civil se mueve contra la ratificación exprés del CETA en el Parlamento Europeo.
An open letter to the sixteen governments negotiating the Regional Comprehensive Economic PartnershipNearly 70 networks and organisations call on the RCEP negotiators to listen to civil society, not just corporate interests
30-Aug-2016 The NationActivists of various NGOs have urged Asean governments to eliminate investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) from the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) draft.
25-Aug-2016 RTSome 2,000 members of the American Postal Workers Union have gathered in Miami where they are officially opposing the Trans-Pacific Partnership.
24-Aug-2016 Deutsche WelleHundreds of thousands of protesters are expected to take to the streets in several German cities to rally against plans to move forward with two key international trade agreements - one year after a similar protest managed to attract similar numbers.
23-Aug-2016 APRNNeither the TPP nor the RCEP, neither the US nor China and their corporations will ever address the long-standing people’s aspiration for an international trading system that responds to their needs.
bilaterals.org is a collaborative space to share information and support movements struggling against bilateral trade and investment deals which serve corporations, not people. Multilingual. Global. No one owns it. Open publishing. Get involved.