- About bilaterals.org
- Feb-2016: New ISDS platform launched
- Sep-2004: Launch announcement
- Feb-2015: Relaunch of bilaterals.org
- Mar-2013: Relaunch of bilaterals.org
- Jun-2009: Relaunch of bilaterals.org
- Dec-2008: An update from bilaterals.org and logo design contest announcement
- Dec-2006: bilaterals.org in Spanish & French
- Sep-2006: Update from bilaterals.org
- How to participate
- Key issues
- Texts of agreements
Resistance grows to EU-Canada trade deal
European Voice | 11 Oct 2012
Resistance grows to EU-Canada trade deal
By Andrew Gardner
Commission and Canadian government hoping for a deal as soon as possible.
Canadian trade negotiators will arrive in Brussels on Monday (15 October) amid an increasingly intense domestic debate about the value of the free-trade deal.
The Canadian government and the European Commission are both keen to complete talks this year on the comprehensive economic and trade agreement (CETA), whose liberalisation of services and removal of tariffs could, the Commission believes, be worth a combined €20 billion annually to the two economies.
A Canadian official said that “significant progress has been achieved across the board”, including on goods, services, investment and procurement.
The talks have received little attention in Europe, but critics in Canada are mounting a strong campaign. The focus on the agreement has been sharpened by the 25th anniversary of the North American free-trade agreement (NAFTA) and by ongoing US efforts to create a Trans-Pacific Partnership, an 11-country trade deal that includes Canada. A recent poll suggested that just 33% of Canadians believe NAFTA has helped the economy.
Political uncertainty has also been created by the victory of the separatist-minded Parti Québécois in regional elections in September. The party’s trade minister, Jean-François Lisée, has said he is “moderately optimistic” that the Quebec government will sign up.
One outstanding issue is an EU clause compensating patent-holders for the time taken to gain market authorisation. Canadian producers of generic drugs claim that this would increase costs for Canadian taxpayers. This argument appears to have gained traction. A poll in September suggested that the public’s support for CETA dropped from 81% to 31% once it was suggested that health costs could rise.
More broadly, some opponents argue that Canada’s central government is using CETA to force liberalisation on provincial governments. They also say that some clauses could harm European taxpayers.
Stuart Trew of the Trade Justice Network said that investment rules – over which the EU gained competence through the Lisbon treaty – would make it easier for corporations “to sue European governments for public policies that purportedly breach corporate rights”.
He also said that a ‘negative-list’ approach to services – under which a service sector, unless named, is automatically covered by the agreement – opens the way for a liberalisation of public services.
That view was rejected by Jason Langrish of the transatlantic Canada-Europe Roundtable for Business, who said that this approach “will allow for inclusion of services that have not yet been invented”. The Commission argues that a ‘negative approach’ is more transparent.
News from the movements
29-Apr-2017 Asamblea Argentina Mejor sin TLC
Encuentro de Pensamiento Crítico - La agenda internacional del gobierno de Cambiemos: ¿una integración a la medida del Foro Económico de Davos?¿Qué significa la liberalización para los y las trabajadores/as de la Argentina y para el pueblo en su conjunto? ¿Tiene importancia que la OMC venga a Argentina? ¿Cuál debería ser nuestra respuesta?
27-Apr-2017 Mujeres en la MingaNosotras las Mujeres, luchamos contra los TLC ya que estos acuerdos son más que simples reglamentaciones del comercio entre países, son estrategias de dominación de las personas.
27-Apr-2017 Forum against FTAsTrade unions, farmers groups, health activists, and other people’s movements are planning to organise a series of events to put pressure on the Government of India to withdraw from RCEP negotiations.
24-Apr-2017 GRAINTenemos por delante, potencialmente, una ola de nuevas normas de “comercio, inversión y cooperación”, y nuestra región se verá fuertemente presionada a aceptar más abusos e indefensión ante las empresas.
24-Apr-2017 USWAfter three decades of NAFTA, Mexican workers are still denied basic rights.
21-Apr-2017 Chile Mejor sin TPPSus representantes afirmaron que tratados como el TPP, el TISA y otros acentúan el extractivismo intensivo en uso de agua y atentan contra las decisiones soberanas de los pueblos respecto al medioambiente.
10-Apr-2017 Coalition Nationale "Non aux APE"La Coalition se désole de ce que des citoyens arrivent difficilement à échanger avec les autorités de ce pays sur des questions aussi importantes que les APE et la ZLEC.
7-Apr-2017 Argentina Mejor sin TLCLos pueblos latinoamericanos decimos NO a los Tratados de Libre Comercio ¡Basta de privilegios para las empresas a costa de nuestros derechos!
bilaterals.org is a collaborative space to share information and support movements struggling against bilateral trade and investment deals which serve corporations, not people. Multilingual. Global. No one owns it. Open publishing. Get involved.