|
|
|
|
In 2000, the European Union and the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States, otherwise known as the ACP group, adopted the Cotonou Agreement, which is a framework treaty on trade, aid and political cooperation. It replaced the previous Lomé Convention, providing for a general set of privileged relations between the EU and the ACP countries in matters of market access, technical assistance and other issues. The objective is to facilitate the economic and political integration of the ACP countries into a liberalised world market over the next 20 years.
Under the Cotonou Agreement, the parties agreed to negotiate a separate set of individual bilateral treaties between the EU and the participating ACP countries. Those individual arrangements, dubbed "Economic Partnership Agreements", would provide specific rights and obligations tailored to six arbitrarily defined clusters of countries (West Africa, Eastern and Southern Africa, Central Africa, SADC, the Caribbean and the Pacific). The EPAs are meant to be comprehensive free trade agreements, laced with rethoric about "development" and "regional integration". The negotiations on these EPAs started in September 2002 and were supposed to be completed by 31 December 2007, as a WTO waiver on the non-compatibility of the EU’s preferential trade relations with ACP countries would expire by then. (The EU pushed "WTO compatibility" as a frame for the talks and ACP countries accepted it.) As the talks advanced, ACP governments became caught between a rock and a hard place. They wanted the bits of market access that the EPAs offered, but would have to pay an extremely high price in terms of loss of customs revenue, destabilisation of their economies from the expected flood of EU imports, unclear financial aid commitments from Brussels, reduced political autonomy, etc. Civil society, labour unions and business groups in the ACP countries studied the implications and came out with vigourous campaigns to stop the signing of the EPAs. The 31 December 2007 deadline for the EPAs to be signed came and went with much drama. A number of states — including Papua New Guinea, Fiji, Ghana and Cote d’Ivoire — initialled interim EPAs before the deadline. Others, like Senegal, swore they would not sign until development concerns were seriously taken on board. In 2008, negotiations continued to secure full acceptance of interim EPAs and move them towards agreed comprehensive EPAs. A state of play as of October 2009 (courtesy of Marc Maes at 11.11.11) is provided below:
last update: October 2009 |
Haïti-Ue-Ape : La coalition « Bare Ape » appelle le parlement à ne pas ratifier l’accord
| 22-December-2009
Warning to the government against the corporatization of the Land and the Sea: Blockade!
| 26-November-2009
Suspender la negociación del TLC de la Unión Europea con Perú y Colombia: freno a la injusticia y la desigualdad
| 20-November-2009
|