bilaterals.org logo
bilaterals.org logo

PACER & PICTA

The Pacific Island Countries Trade Agreement (PICTA) is a free trade agreement on trade in goods among 14 members of the Pacific Islands Forum (Australia and New Zealand are excluded.) It was signed in 2001. Eleven countries — Cook Islands, Fiji, Kiribati, Nauru, Niue, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Tuvalu and Vanuatu — have so far ratified PICTA. As of 2008, PICTA was expanded to include Trade in Services (TiS), however since its signing in 2012 the TiS-Protocol has only been ratified by 4 signatories (Samoa, Tuvalu, Nauru, and Republic of the Marshall Islands), leaving it not yet in force. Given their recent membership to the Pacific Islands Forum New Caledonia and French Polynesia are able to accede to the agreement.

The Pacific Agreement on Closer Economic Relations or PACER is a framework agreement to deepen trade and investment liberalisation in the broader Pacific on a step by step basis. It was signed in 2001 and came into force in 2002. PACER includes Australia and New Zealand, and commits all members to begin negotiations towards a free trade agreement by 2011 at the latest. In August 2008, Simon Crean, Australia’s Trade Minister at the time, started advocating a “PACER-Plus” agreement, in lieu of the originally envisaged FTA, which signals the aggressiveness of Australia’s stance to achieve an agreement, particularly given the EU’s pending Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) with the Pacific Island states. A number of officials and civil society critiques from the Pacific Islands have stated that the PACER deal is of little benefit to them, some pushing for greater labour mobility for Pacific Island workers to Australia and New Zealand. In June 2011, Fiji’s Attorney-General charged that PACER is only really benefitting the economically powerful in the region – Australia and New Zealand.

PACER-Plus built on the previous PACER framework agreement when negotiations began in 2009, before being concluded in 2017. It is a comprehensive free trade agreement, which requires a significant restructure of the Pacific countries’ economy but they are not getting anything in return.

Previously Australia and New Zealand had given non-reciprocal preferential access for Pacific Island Countries exports but PACER-Plus replaces that for the Parties involved, giving Australia and New Zealand preferential access into the Pacific Islands for goods, services and investment. Academics, legal scholars, and civil society organisations have criticised the agreement as having little practical benefit for the Pacific Islands due to the asymmetry of the commitments and economic relationship. As Papua New Guinea Minister Maru summed up the situation in 2017: “The trade is so lopsided and to their advantage... They take so much out of this country and yet they don’t want to talk about economic partnership with this country - a deal where we will get a far better deal.” PACER-Plus also contains non-enforceable arrangements on “Development Assistance” and “Labour Mobility”.

Despite the agreement, the absence of Fiji, Papua New Guinea, Palau, The Republic of the Marshall Islands and the Federated States of Micronesia leaves over 85% of the Pacific Islands economy outside of PACER-Plus. PACER-Plus came into force on December 13, 2020 with initial members to the agreement being Australia, New Zealand, Tonga, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Niue, Kiribati, and the Cook Islands. Nauru, Tuvalu and Vanuatu have signed the agreement but are yet to ratify.

Read the text of the agreement here

Contributed by the Pacific Network on Globalisation (PANG)

last update: April 2021
Photo: Tabu PACER Plus/Facebook


Trade deals spark warning
The Pacific Network on Globalisation warned Pacific governments to be wary of viewing Pacific Island Countries Trade Agreement as "stepping stone" towards free trade deals with rich nations.
Crean spruiks free trade in Pacific
The tiny island nations of the south Pacific should have high ambitions heading into free trade negotiations with Australia, Trade Minister Simon Crean says.
PACER: Islands could lose $10m anually in revenue
Some Pacific island countries stand to lose up to US$10 million annually in revenue due to trade liberalisation under the Pacific Agreement on Closer Economic Relations, according to a report commissioned by the Secretariat of the Pacific Islands Forum
US-NZ Partnership Forum: Neo-liberalism - Pacific Style
According to the organizers, this year’s US-NZ Partnership Forum will in part focus on the, “potential for the United States and New Zealand to cooperate on ... economic development and sustainability in the Asia Pacific region.”
PICTA impact study - final report
This study was prompted by concern among some of the smaller Forum Island Countries about the impact of the introduction of the Pacific Island Countries Trade Agreement (PICTA) on their local economies and, specifically, the impact of a reduction in tariffs on government revenues.
Palau president doubts free trade push
Palau’s president, Tommy Remengesau, believes the Pacific Islands Forum - comprising 16 independent countries of the Pacific including Australia and New Zealand - is introducing free trade into the region in the wrong way.
Australia seeks equal trade rights in South Pacific
Australia says it wants trade rights in the South Pacific equal to those being negotiated by the European Union.
Talks to look at Pacific trade deal
A meeting in August is likely to explore the possibility of a free trade agreement between Pacific Island countries and New Zealand and Australia but rapid progress is not expected.
Australia And New Zealand Seek Pacific FTA
Australia and New Zealand will begin discussions in August to strike a free trade deal with a group of Pacific island nations.
A citizen’s guide to an emerging empire
This article is an introduction or guide to PICTA, PACER and the WTO in the Pacific. The ’guide’ gives readers basic knowledge of both trade agreements and the stepping stone function they provide towards the WTO re-colonising the Pacific.