All comments

    JRV:
    26-May-2011

    El arancel para la Harina de pescado es del 15%, no del 20%, serìa solo importante verificarlo!

    Josè Raùl

    Joseph Purugganan, EU-ASEAN FTA Campaign Network:
    23-May-2011

    While governments and the corporate sector are pushing for a free trade agreement between the EU and ASEAN, peoples’ movements and civil society organizations from across Southeast Asia have expressed their strong opposition to the trade deal.

    The ASEAN Civil Society Conference/ASEAN Peoples Forum came out with statement criticizing ASEAN’s pursuit of FTAs. The statement reads "While ASEAN recognizes the development asymmetries that exist in the region and the urgent need to narrow the development gap to ensure that economic benefits are felt by the poorest and marginalized sectors, its continued and aggressive push for free trade agreements (FTAs) negotiated in almost total secrecy and devoid of people’s participation, poses a very serious threat to people’s rights to jobs and livelihood, food, health and access to medicines and education, and would undermine efforts to address poverty and inequality in the region."

    Various trade and health groups campaigning against the EU FTAs with ASEAN also issued an open letter calling on ASEAN leaders to defend peoples right to health and guarantee access to affordable medicines. According to the group, "the future supply of life-saving medicines is under threat from aggressive trade policies being imposed on developing countries in particular by the European Union and United States of America.

    The group zeroed in on the EU adding "the EU’s demand for stricter intellectual property right(IPR) provisions under the FTA will seriously curtail the ability of local generic drug companies to produce and distribute more affordable versions of these life-saving medicines. Restrictive IPR provisions will have profound effects on costs of medicines and medical treatment in the region."

    There is no doubt that corporations from EU and ASEAN are just eager to conclude an ambitious and comprehensive trade and invesmten deal between the two regions. The importance given to the EU-ASEAN Business summit in Jakarta attest to this. There is growing indication as well that ASEAN governments are more than willing to engage the EU in FTA negotiations either on a bilateral or region to region basis. The critical question however is whether governments will listen to the demands of its own people.

    yUSRI:
    12-May-2011

    Can we pay the duty under protest pending Form E and claim for refund later?

    B shah:
    6-May-2011

    It is better we sign a Barter Agreement for goods preferable to both with viz
    with Indian/Pak rupees. As done during
    Gen Ayub times with Iran

    B Shah

    ussefco:
    28-Apr-2011

    Bonjour;
    vous devrez être plus précis au niveau des chiffres. entre autre était 10 ème fournisseur en 2006 (elle a perdu une ou deux places entre temps)

    Jodie:
    7-Apr-2011

    "it will withdraw the FTA bill and start the process all over."

    Sounds like this is the only option to me, however time-consuming it might be. The fact is, there are some situations where you just can’t afford errors of any kind, least of all translation errors. Medical records being one example, legal documents being another and, of course, trade agreements! One translation error and a nation could find itself in breach of an agreement without even knowing it.

    There’s any number translation agencies out there, so there’s really no excuse for that kind of thing. I know governements are cutting costs and the rest of it but there are some savings that’ll cost you in the long run.

    fernando:
    31-Mar-2011

    Interesante el artículo, nos hace recordar que este problema ya se había planteado por algunos analistas en periódicos como la Jornada desde el año 2008.Al Estado mexicano no le preocupa está situación, al contario sigue profundizando el daño a México.El diagnóstico neoliberal-por así llamarlo- es otro, continuar la dependencia alimentaria, no importa lo que se gaste.Y ese juego todos los políticos del país le han entrado,en mayor o menor medida, lo que les importa es el poder.Llevamo 29 años de estas ¨sanas medidas* y no tiene para cuando acabar.


    31-Mar-2011

    Is there any FTA between Pakistan and SA?


    30-Mar-2011

    Your college term papers are not relevant outside college, lack of pending differences between EAC and EPAS make the story weak and almost a PR gimmick.

    Jean-Marc:
    28-Mar-2011

    J’ai l’impression que le journaliste n’a pas tout compris.

    chaster matt:
    28-Mar-2011

    Colombia regularly participates in international fora, including CICAD, the Organization of American States’ body on money laundering, chemical controls, and drug abuse prevention. Although the Colombian Government ratified the 1988 UN Convention on Narcotics in 1994—the last of the Andean governments to do so—it took important reservations, notably to the anti-money-laundering measures, asset forfeiture and confiscation provisions, maritime interdiction, and extradition clauses. Colombia subsequently withdrew some of its reservations, most notably a reservation on extradition.Custom kitchen cabinets

    Phil Y:
    25-Mar-2011

    Just wondering, is this in the ’initialling by the Commission’ stage yet, and if there are any indications as to when this stage might begin?

    Thanks,

    Phil Y, Turks and Caicos Resorts

    EmmAce:
    21-Mar-2011

    .. this article is on point for it reveals the disadvantages and shifts focus from the consequental advantages that come with raw materials..


    1-Mar-2011

    Hi. I found this article confusing. It seems to paint the Harper government, the EU TNCs and the Canadian corporations as "the bad guys" who push environmental standards down and the EU policy makers as "the good guys" who try to protect them a bit more. Yet just the other day it was the EU policy makers who, through the European Parliament’s ratification of the EU-Korea FTA, got the Korean government to lower its standards on fuel efficiency and carbon dioxide emissions so that European automakers could sell more cars there. The US government, I understand, has been trying to achieve exactly the same, for the benefit of US car manufacturers, in its own proposed FTA with Korea.

    I think how governments use trade policy (and today that means FTAs, not WTO) to set new standards is extremely important, whether you talk about climate or animal welfare or food safety or whatever. It just seems to me that it is hardly a matter of public policy at all anymore. It’s more about dividing markets for the corporations. If that’s so, then maybe we have to do more to show how the corporates actually control or shape the policy making process. Projecting the Harper administration as the bully and Brussels as somehow trying to get things right is not going to help, if you see what I mean.

    Thanks.

    Paul-Emile Dupret:
    11-Feb-2011

    Thanks for the comment.
    If you allow me to correct the text here above. The correct order at the EU side is the following :
     end of negotiations (already occured in march 2010) and revision of texts
     initialling by the Commission (not yet ocurred today (11/02/2011)
     signature of the council (January 2012 ?)
     ratification by European Parliament (and national and local parliaments if it is a mixed agreement)
     conclusion of the agreement by the council

    Provisional entry into force can be any time proposed by the Commission after the signature by the Council. Most probably just after the ratification by the EP, for diplomatic reasons.
    Regards,

    Jose:
    13-Jan-2011

    Creo que la empresa debería demandar a ciertos medios de comunicación como El diario el Comercio que dá información falsa sobre este tema y difama a la empresa. El hecho de ser prácticamente el amo de los medios de comunicación : Perú 21, Canal 4, el trome , canal N y atacar sistematicamente sin investigacion seria ni pruebas deteriorando cada vez mas la imagen de esta empresa es un hecho que debería tomarse en cuenta. Una cosa es ser simpatizante de algunos de los acreedores de Doe Run que reclaman legítimamente sus acreencias pero otra cosa es difamar para congraciarse con ellos. la verdad la conducta de este medio de comunicacion deja mucho que desear, ha caido en las practicas montesinistas y wolfensistas que tanto criticó en el pasado. una lástima

    Luis:
    12-Jan-2011

    Los TLC establece, entre otros, los mecanismos de protección en las relaciones comerciales entre países y acelera las cosas cuando existe una controversia. No son impuestos sino negociados. El TLC del Perú con Estados Unidos tiene el consenso nacional de que protege correctamente los intereses peruanos.

    Aquí la controversia de fondo es determinar de quien es la responsabilidad ambiental ante unos juicios iniciados en Estados Unidos por supuestos daños ambientales ocasionados, según la empresa, por efecto de contaminación que era de responsabilidad del Estado remediarla.

    Doe Run expresa que ha cumplido con creces sus compromisos señalados en el contrato firmado con el Estado para la administración de la operación minera y el Estado por su parte indica que no ha sido así. En este proceso, según la empresa, el Estado no ha actuado diligentemente y ha omitido sus obligaciones.

    En comunicados públicos la empresa ha invitado al gobierno del Perú a dialogar y alcanzar una solución que beneficie a la ciudad de La Oroya donde opera Doe Run.

    ¿Que sigue?...Que ambas parte conversen y se alcance una solución responsable. Un arbitraje sin una posición sólida sería de un costo altísimo para la parte más débil.

    Danley Wolfe:
    6-Jan-2011

    Let’s be perfectly clear. Elizabeth Schuler’s (secretary treasurer of AFL-CIO) op-ed on the ratification-pending Korea-U.S. FTA (KORUS), widely distributed to the media, is the expected protectionist reaction from her labor union, but her claims are totally unfounded. The renegotiated agreement if anything strongly favors the American automobile industry and will likely face new opposition in Korea. The economics are clear - KORUSE is a winner for both sides increasing economic growth and jobs, while strengthening critical U.S. interests in Asia. it’s time to take off the blinders when we are looking at important international agreements.


    2-Dec-2010

    on what specifically?eu ftas?that would be european trade commision site..


    2-Dec-2010

    Correction svp: la Belgique exerce la présidence jusqu’au 31/12/2010.