- About bilaterals.org
- Feb-2016: New ISDS platform launched
- Sep-2004: Launch announcement
- Feb-2015: Relaunch of bilaterals.org
- Mar-2013: Relaunch of bilaterals.org
- Jun-2009: Relaunch of bilaterals.org
- Dec-2008: An update from bilaterals.org and logo design contest announcement
- Dec-2006: bilaterals.org in Spanish & French
- Sep-2006: Update from bilaterals.org
- How to participate
- Key issues
- Texts of agreements
Analysis of the TiSA “annex on transparency”
Greenpeace | 25 November 2016
Analysis of the TiSA “Annex on Transparency” (version dated 14 September 2016)
Better and more comprehensive transparency – these are core demands of civil society organizations in the debate surrounding free trade agreements. Yet, TiSA, along with CETA and TTIP, is an example of how free trade agreements are negotiated behind closed doors. Greenpeace is in possession of a negotiation text on transparency, dated September 14th 2016. According to negotiators, there appears to be a new (secret) text ready. Despite, this we want to publish this text from September, as it clearly shows the differences between the negotiating partners. We believe that the text can contribute to the public debate, along with the troublesome content that we expected to find in the final text as well.
The transparency proposed within the TiSA Agreement, which applies only to the parties but also to interested persons, is welcomed. However, given the secretive nature of the TiSA negotiations so far, Greenpeace concludes that th negotiations not only make a mockery of transparency, it abuses the very principle of transparency. Transparency in TiSA is asymmetrical in favoring large corporations that are financially strong and well established, while ordinary citizens lack opportunities and the access to actually make use of transparency. Transparency, as proposed in TiSA, allows for corporations to be informed early of planned measures and provided with opportunities for exerting their influence and alter or block new regulation. At the same time, opportunities for TiSA signatories to provide transparency on their own terms are restricted.
Similar regulations on transparency are also found in CETA, currently being voted on in the European Parliament. Generally it must be ensured that transparency in trade agreements also applies to civil society – not only on the paper but also in reality. There is a need for a new global trade system that is not based on exploitation but instead serves humanity, the international understanding and the environment. Greenpeace is calling for an abandonment of the old system as a first step in developing this new trade system. This means terminating all free trade agreements such as TiSA, CETA, TTIP and TPP and turning away from the failed neoliberal free trade paradigm that unilaterally favors the
interests of multinational corporations and foreign investors.
Read more (pdf)
News from the movements
23-Mar-2017 Front anti APE et anti CFA - SénégalLe comité de pilotage du Front anti Accords de Partenariat Economique (APE) et anti franc CFA après avoir apprécié la situation politique, économique et sociale actuelle a pris des décisions importantes.
22-Mar-2017 S2BJoint civil society statement on the Eu-Japan free trade agreement.
22-Mar-2017 G20 ProtestsLa “Semana de solidaridad global” contra el G20 nos dará la oportunidad de expresar el otro mundo y nuestra convicción de que es posible.
17-Mar-2017 No al TTIP
Taller de formación: ‘El Tratado de los Pueblos y las normas vinculantes de la ONU. Alternativas al TTIP, CETA, TiSA’El taller se impartirá de forma presencial en Madrid y se transmitirá en tiempo real.
Ces « zones libres » en Europe qui privilégient les alternatives locales face au néolibéralisme globalDes élus volontaristes pourront-ils, demain, soutenir la relocalisation de l’économie, favoriser les aliments bios et locaux dans les cantines scolaires ou reprendre la main sur la gestion de l’eau ou de l’énergie ?
15-Mar-2017 Tele SurRiot police clashed with protesters in Viña Del Mar, where representatives of the 11 remaining member states of the Trans Pacific Partnership together with China, Colombia and South Korea met.
15-Mar-2017 Tele SurActivists have a message for trade ministers meeting in Chile: the TPP is dead.
11-Mar-2017 No al TTIP
Invitación webinar: ¿Un ISDS multilateral? La propuesta de la Comisión Europea para un ‘Tribunal Multilateral de Inversiones’Este webinar presentará la propuesta de la Comisión Europea así como varias perspectivas críticas sobre el tema.
bilaterals.org is a collaborative space to share information and support movements struggling against bilateral trade and investment deals which serve corporations, not people. Multilingual. Global. No one owns it. Open publishing. Get involved.