- About bilaterals.org
- Feb-2016: New ISDS platform launched
- Sep-2004: Launch announcement
- Feb-2015: Relaunch of bilaterals.org
- Mar-2013: Relaunch of bilaterals.org
- Jun-2009: Relaunch of bilaterals.org
- Dec-2008: An update from bilaterals.org and logo design contest announcement
- Dec-2006: bilaterals.org in Spanish & French
- Sep-2006: Update from bilaterals.org
- How to participate
- Key issues
- Texts of agreements
Analysis of the TiSA “annex on transparency”
Greenpeace | 25 November 2016
Analysis of the TiSA “Annex on Transparency” (version dated 14 September 2016)
Better and more comprehensive transparency – these are core demands of civil society organizations in the debate surrounding free trade agreements. Yet, TiSA, along with CETA and TTIP, is an example of how free trade agreements are negotiated behind closed doors. Greenpeace is in possession of a negotiation text on transparency, dated September 14th 2016. According to negotiators, there appears to be a new (secret) text ready. Despite, this we want to publish this text from September, as it clearly shows the differences between the negotiating partners. We believe that the text can contribute to the public debate, along with the troublesome content that we expected to find in the final text as well.
The transparency proposed within the TiSA Agreement, which applies only to the parties but also to interested persons, is welcomed. However, given the secretive nature of the TiSA negotiations so far, Greenpeace concludes that th negotiations not only make a mockery of transparency, it abuses the very principle of transparency. Transparency in TiSA is asymmetrical in favoring large corporations that are financially strong and well established, while ordinary citizens lack opportunities and the access to actually make use of transparency. Transparency, as proposed in TiSA, allows for corporations to be informed early of planned measures and provided with opportunities for exerting their influence and alter or block new regulation. At the same time, opportunities for TiSA signatories to provide transparency on their own terms are restricted.
Similar regulations on transparency are also found in CETA, currently being voted on in the European Parliament. Generally it must be ensured that transparency in trade agreements also applies to civil society – not only on the paper but also in reality. There is a need for a new global trade system that is not based on exploitation but instead serves humanity, the international understanding and the environment. Greenpeace is calling for an abandonment of the old system as a first step in developing this new trade system. This means terminating all free trade agreements such as TiSA, CETA, TTIP and TPP and turning away from the failed neoliberal free trade paradigm that unilaterally favors the
interests of multinational corporations and foreign investors.
Read more (pdf)
News from the movements
29-Apr-2017 Asamblea Argentina Mejor sin TLC
Encuentro de Pensamiento Crítico - La agenda internacional del gobierno de Cambiemos: ¿una integración a la medida del Foro Económico de Davos?¿Qué significa la liberalización para los y las trabajadores/as de la Argentina y para el pueblo en su conjunto? ¿Tiene importancia que la OMC venga a Argentina? ¿Cuál debería ser nuestra respuesta?
27-Apr-2017 Mujeres en la MingaNosotras las Mujeres, luchamos contra los TLC ya que estos acuerdos son más que simples reglamentaciones del comercio entre países, son estrategias de dominación de las personas.
27-Apr-2017 Forum against FTAsTrade unions, farmers groups, health activists, and other people’s movements are planning to organise a series of events to put pressure on the Government of India to withdraw from RCEP negotiations.
24-Apr-2017 GRAINTenemos por delante, potencialmente, una ola de nuevas normas de “comercio, inversión y cooperación”, y nuestra región se verá fuertemente presionada a aceptar más abusos e indefensión ante las empresas.
24-Apr-2017 USWAfter three decades of NAFTA, Mexican workers are still denied basic rights.
21-Apr-2017 Chile Mejor sin TPPSus representantes afirmaron que tratados como el TPP, el TISA y otros acentúan el extractivismo intensivo en uso de agua y atentan contra las decisiones soberanas de los pueblos respecto al medioambiente.
10-Apr-2017 Coalition Nationale "Non aux APE"La Coalition se désole de ce que des citoyens arrivent difficilement à échanger avec les autorités de ce pays sur des questions aussi importantes que les APE et la ZLEC.
7-Apr-2017 Argentina Mejor sin TLCLos pueblos latinoamericanos decimos NO a los Tratados de Libre Comercio ¡Basta de privilegios para las empresas a costa de nuestros derechos!
bilaterals.org is a collaborative space to share information and support movements struggling against bilateral trade and investment deals which serve corporations, not people. Multilingual. Global. No one owns it. Open publishing. Get involved.